WHY SUBSCRIBE TO ARCHBOLD 2010?

1. Your time is far too valuable to have it wasted searching for information. To that end, Archbold is divided into logical sections using a consistent set of headings and sub-headings. It includes thousands of cross-references and is fully indexed, lightening the burden of research.
2. It concentrates on what the law is, rather than what it ought to be, covering both substantive law and the practice
   and procedure of the Crown Court.
3. With 185 years’ authority informing every page, Archbold is the reference work to cite in court, adding weight and
   credibility to your arguments.
4. Separate chapters cover each indictable offence in depth, from forgery to murder, enhancing your understanding
   of the crimes relevant to your current cases.
5. We don’t believe you want to wade through impenetrable text. To that end, Archbold is written in straightforward
   language and short paragraphs.
6. With single-volume paper and CD-ROM formats available, Archbold is both portable and easy to access,
   ensuring journeys to court don’t become workouts.
7. Updated three times a year and supplemented by Archbold Review, Archbold keeps you abreast of the latest developments in criminal law, from case law to new Statutory Instruments.
8. The service now includes the Archbold e-update which provides you with a weekly email containing the latest, relevant updates in crime. Cross-referenced through paragraph to the mainwork, the e-update will allow you to contextualise the information within Archbold. What’s more, the content will be archived online so you have access to it anytime.

Archbold 2010 has been fully revised and updated with recent important changes in legislation and case law and also
includes new SIs and Practice Directions.

Statutes
Statutory Instruments
Practice Directions
Sentencing guidelines
Attorney-General's guidelines
Guidance to prosecutors
Cases

Statutes

Counter-Terrorism Act 2008

Statutory instruments

Criminal Defence Service (Funding) (Amendment) Order 2009 (SI 2009 No. 1843)
Criminal Defence Service (Funding) (Amendment No. 2) Order 2009 (SI 2009 No. 2086)
Criminal Defence Service (General) (No. 2) (Amendment) Regulations 2009 (SI 2009 No. 1853)
Criminal Defence Service (Information Requests) (Prescribed Benefits) Regulations 2009 (SI 2009 No. 212)
Criminal Defence Service (Provisional Representation Orders) Regulations 2009 (SI 2009 No. 1995)
Criminal Procedure (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2008 (SI 2008 No. 3269)
Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2009 (SI 2009 No. 2087)
Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (Amendment) Order 2008 (SI 2008 No. 3130)
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Revisions to Code A) Order 2008 (SI 2008 No. 2638)
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Revisions to Code A) (No. 2) Order 2008 (SI 2008 No. 3146)
Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) (Amendment) (England and Wales) Order 2009 (SI 2009 No. 1818)
Sexual Offences Act (Prescribed Police Stations) Regulations 2009 (SI 2009 No. 722)

Practice directions

Practice Direction (Criminal proceedings: substituted and additional provisions)

Sentencing guidelines

On breach of an anti-social behaviour order
On theft and burglary in a building other than a dwelling
On attempted murder

Attorney-General’s guidelines

On plea discussions in cases of serious or complex fraud

Guidance to prosecutors

Crown Prosecution Service guidance to prosecutors as to the discretion to institute confiscation proceedings

Cases including

Advance indication of sentence; R v Patel
Aiding and abetting suicide; R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions (Society for the Protection of Unborn Children intervening)
Appeal; fresh evidence; diminished responsibility; R v Erskine; R v Williams
Assault; ingredients of; McMillan v CPS
Bias; defendant threatening judge after conviction and prior to sentence; R v Mehta, Sharman, Reardon and Ratcliff
Burglary of a dwelling; sentencing guidance; R v Saw
Causing or allowing death of child or vulnerable adult; R v Khan, Naureen and Hussain
Citation of authorities; R v Erskine; R v Williams
Confiscation; assessment of benefit of couriers and minders; R v Allpress
Confiscation; benefit; R v Islam
Confiscation; benefit; R v Seager; R v Blatch
Confiscation; compatibility of regime with European Convention on Human Rights; Grayson v UK
Confiscation; prosecutorial discretion; pecuniary advantage; R v N; R v P; R v Paulet
Confiscation; proof of expenditure; R v Winters
Contempt; conduct which has already been the subject of criminal proceedings; Slade v Slade
Credit for time on remand; R v Nnaji; R v Johnson
Dangerous driving; “special skill” of driver; R v Bannister
Determination of minimum term for murder; R v Height and Anderson
Diminished responsibility; alcohol dependency syndrome; R v Stewart (James)
Diminished responsibility; withdrawing murder charge from jury; R v Khan
Hearsay; “interests of justice” and absent witnesses; R v Z
Hearsay; statements of absent witnesses; right to a fair trial; Al-Khawaja v UK; Tahery v UK
Hearsay; statements of absent witnesses; right to a fair trial; R v Horncastle and Blackmore; R v Marquis and Graham;
R v Carter
Hearsay; “statements”; text messages; R v Leonard
Hospital orders; R (DB) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust; R (X) v An NHS Trust
Insider dealing; sentence; R v McQuoid
Jury; police officer as juror; R v GC
Jury; police officer as juror; R v Yemoh
Manslaughter; diminished responsibility; sentence; R v Wood
Manslaughter by gross negligence; duty of care; R v Evans (Gemma)
Offensive weapons; forgetfulness and reasonable excuse; R v Tsap
Prosecution appeals; R v O, J and S
Prosecution costs; investigation expenses; R v Balshaw
Restraint order; whether permissible to pay legal fees out of restrained assets; Irwin Mitchell v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office
Restraint orders; Re B (Restraint Order)
Restriction on consecutive sentences for released prisoners; R v Whittles
Road traffic; failing to provide evidential specimen; Hussain v DPP
Sentencing of dangerous offenders in light of amendments made by CJIA 2008; Att.-Gen.’s Reference (No. 55 of 2008)
(R v C)
Seriousness of offence; impact on a person other than the immediate victim; fraud; R v Darwin (Anne) and Darwin (John)
Sex offender notification requirements; R (JF) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (AT) v Same
Sexual activity with a person with a mental disorder impeding choice; R v C
Sexual offences; directing jury in cases of delayed complaint; R v Doody
Terrorism; possession/collection of information; R v G; R v J
Trial on indictment without a jury; R v Twomey (John), Blake (Peter), Cameron (Glen) and Hibberd (Barry)
Use of handcuffs in court; R v Horden
Witness anonymity orders; R v Mayers and other appeals; R v P