WHY SUBSCRIBE TO ARCHBOLD 2012?

1. Your time is far too valuable to have it wasted searching for information. To that end, Archbold is divided into logical sections using a consistent set of headings and sub-headings. It includes thousands of cross-references and is fully indexed, lightening the burden of research.
2. It concentrates on what the law is, rather than what it ought to be, covering both substantive law and the practice
   and procedure of the Crown Court.
3. With 190 years’ authority informing every page, Archbold is the reference work to cite in court, adding weight and
   credibility to your arguments.
4. Separate chapters cover each indictable offence in depth, from forgery to murder, enhancing your understanding
   of the crimes relevant to your current cases.
5. We don’t believe you want to wade through impenetrable text. To that end, Archbold is written in straightforward
   language and short paragraphs.
6. With single-volume paper and CD-ROM formats available, Archbold is both portable and easy to access,
   ensuring journeys to court don’t become workouts.
7. Updated three times a year and supplemented by Archbold Review, Archbold keeps you abreast of the latest developments in criminal law, from case law to new Statutory Instruments.
8. Includes the Archbold eUpdate which provides you with a weekly email containing the latest, relevant updates in crime. Cross-referenced through paragraph to the mainwork, the eUpdate will allow you to contextualise the information within Archbold. What’s more, the content will be archived online so you have access to it anytime.

Archbold 2012 has been fully revised and updated with recent important changes in legislation and case law and also includes new SIs and Practice Directions.

Statutes
Statutory Instruments
Codes of Practice
Practice Directions and Guidance
Procudure Rules
Attorney-General's guidelines
Cases

Statutes

Identity Documents Act 2010
Police (Detention and Bail) Act 2011

Statutory Instruments

Bribery Act 2010 (Consequential Amendments) Order 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 1441)
Criminal Defence Service (General) (No. 2) (Amendment) Regulations 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 1453)
Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (Defence Disclosure Time Limits) Regulations 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 209)
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (Amendment) Order 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 1868)
Money Laundering (Amendment) Regulations 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 1781)
Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) (Amendment) (England and Wales) Order 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 1800)
Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Prescribed Police Stations) Regulations 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 1788)
Treaty of Lisbon (Changes in Terminology) Order 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 1043)
Terrorism Act 2000 (Remedial) Order 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 631)
Terrorism Act 2000 (Designated Ports) Order 2011
Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 (Commencement No. 9) Order 2010 (S.I. 2010 No. 2541)
Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 (Specification for Imitation Firearms) Regulations 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 1754)

Codes of Practice

Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (Codes of Practice) (Revision of Codes A, B and D) Order 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 412)

Practice Directions and Guidance

Achieving Best Evidence: Guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, and guidance on using special measures
Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses: a Police Service Guide
Guidance about procedures which relevant commercial organisations can put into place to prevent persons associated with them from bribing
Serious Fraud Office and DPP guidance on the approach to prosecutorial decision-making in respect of offences under sections 1, 2, 6 and 7 of the Bribery Act 2010
Sentencing Council for England and Wales’s Definitive Guideline on Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person
Live text-based Communications; Practice Guidance (Court Proceedings: Live Text-based Communications) and Policy on the use of live text-based communications (Supreme Court)
Case management; listing; Consolidated Criminal Practice Direction (Amendment No. 25) (Criminal Proceedings: Listing, Case Management)
Bar Council Guidance on Preparation of Defence Statements
Law Society Practice Note on Defence Witness Notices

Procedure Rules

Criminal Procedure Rules 2011 (S.I. 2011 No. 1709)

Attorney-General’s Guidelines

Supplementary Att.-Gen.’s guidelines on disclosure: digitally stored material

Cases

Abuse of process; entrapment; R. v. M.
Abuse of process; executive misconduct; Warren v. Att.-Gen. for Jersey
Abuse of process; human trafficking; R. v. M. (L.), B. (M.) and G. (D.); R. v. Tabot; R. v. Tijani
Abuse of process; submission of no case to answer; delay in reporting offences; R. v. F. (S.)
Accomplice evidence; agreements under SOCPA 2005, s.73; R. v. Daniels
Arrest without warrant; PACE Act 1984, s.24; Shields v. Chief Constable of Merseyside Police
Arrest without warrant; PACE Act 1984, s.24; Hayes v. Chief Constable of Merseyside Police
Appeal; fresh evidence following Newton hearing; R. v. Malook
Appeal; interventions by judge during cross examination; R. v. Zarezadeh
Appeal; retrial; R. v. Maxwell
Appeal; safety of conviction; following guilty plea; incorrect legal advice; R. v. Mohamed (Abdalla); R. v. M.V.; R. v. Mohamed (Rahma Abukar); R. v. Nofallah
Appeal; time limit; date of conviction; R. v. Hawkins
Bad character; application of legislation to proceedings under the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964; R. v. Creed
Bad character; attack on another person’s character; relevance of all convictions; R. v. Clarke (Trevor)
Bad character; propensity; cautions; R. v. Olu, Wilson and Brooks
Bad character; propensity; rape; summing up; R. v. Miller
Bad character; sexual offences against children; relevance of possession of indecent photographs of children; R. v. D. (N.); R. v. P. (A.); R. v. U. (S.)
Bail; children and young persons charged with murder; R. (A. (by a litigation friend)) v. Lewisham Youth Court and DPP
Causing death by driving when disqualified, uninsured, unlicensed; R. v. M.H.
Indecent photographs; R. v. Neal
Confiscation; abuse of process; R. (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions) v. Croydon Crown Court
Confiscation; increase in realisable property; Re Peacock
Confiscation; pecuniary advantage; R. v. Takkar
Confiscation; postponement of proceedings; variation of sentence; R. v. Constantine
Confiscation orders; assessment of benefit; R. v. Clark and Severn
Confiscation proceedings; absence of the defendant; absconding; R. v. Spearing
Contempt; H.M. Att.-Gen. v. M.G.N. Ltd and News Group Newspapers Ltd
Costs; award of costs against the accused; R. v. Dickinson
Costs; defence costs order; R. v. Orrow
Costs; order against prosecution following acquittal; R. v. P
Credit for guilty plea; plea offered but not accepted; R. v. Birt and R. v. Rainford
Deprivation order; R. v. Kearney
Diminished responsibility; hospital order; R. v. Welsh and R. v. Oakley
Disclosure; prosecution duty; R. v. Thambithurai and R. v. Barkshire
Disqualification from working with children; R. v. C.
DNA evidence; low quantity; admissibility; R. v. C.
Parliamentary privilege; R. v. Chaytor, Morley and Devine
Expert witness’s immunity; Jones v. Kaney
Experts; fingerprint evidence; R. v. Smith (Peter)
Fitness to plead; procedure; intermediary; R. v. Walls
Footwear impressions; R. v. T. (footwear mark evidence)
Forgery; identity documents; reasonable excuse; R. v. Unah
Harassment; Protection from Eviction Act 1977, s.1; R. v. Qureshi
Hearsay evidence; text messages; R. v. Bains
Homicide; accessory liability; R. v. Willett
Human rights; protest; freedom of expression; Public Order Act 1986, s.5; Abdul v. DPP
Human rights; prohibition of slavery and forced labour; R. v. K.
Human rights; right to legal advice; Cadder v. H.M. Advocate
Human rights; trial by jury; reasons; Taxquet v. Belgium
Identification; dock identification; Tido v. The Queen
Identification; recognition by a witness; R. v. Moss
Identification parade; duty to invite where multiple complainants; R. v. Gojra and Dhir
Indictment; form and content; R. v. Hartley
Joinder; R. v. Ferrell
Jury tampering; R. v. Twomey, Blake, Hibberd and Cameron (No. 2) and R. v. Guthrie (Riccardo)
Mens rea; murder; duress; R. v. Ness and Awan
Misfeasance in a public office; without reasonable excuse or justification;  R. v. L. (D.)
Money laundering; meaning of “criminal property”; R. v. Amir and Akhtar
Motor vehicle; definition; whether test objective; Coates v. CPS
Murder; self defence; use of reasonable force in the prevention of crime; R. v. Hichens
Offensive weapon; reasonable excuse; N. v. DPP
Perverting the course of justice; retracting a truthful allegation; R. v. A.
Previous conviction; presumption of truthfulness; challenge by defendant; R. v. C.
Privilege; answers which may incriminate; Phillips v. Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd
Restraining orders on acquittal; R. v. Major
Search and seizure powers; Eastenders Cash & Carry Plc v. South Western Magistrates’ Court; R. (Iqbal) v. Luton & South Bedfordshire Magistrates’ Court, R. (El-Kurd) v. Crown Court at Winchester and SOCA and R. (Cook) v. SOCA
Sentence; armed robbery; R. v. Thomas, Mogg, Kassaye and Calderwood
Sentence; assessment of significant risk; R. v. Beesley and Coyle; R. v. Rehman and R. v. Smith (Nicholas)
Sentence; advance indication of sentence; R. v. Omole
Sentence; basis of sentence; agreed basis of plea; R. v. Sanchez
Sentence; contempt; juror contact with acquitted defendant; H.M. Att.-Gen. v. Fraill; R. v. Knox
Sentence; cultivation of cannabis; R. v. Auton; permitting premises to be used for cultivation of cannabis; R. v. Chan
Sentence; immigration; R. v. Heng Pit Ding
Sentence; manslaughter by provocation using a knife; R. v. Thornley
Sentence; murder; R. v. Miah (two murders on same occasion); Att.-Gen.’s Reference (No. 11 of 2011); R. v. Williams (Sanchez) (sexual infidelity as mitigation); R. v. Kelly (taking knife to scene)
Sentence; money laundering; consecutive sentences; R. v. Alexander
Sentence; rape within a relationship; R. v. A. (N.) (Att.-Gen.’s Reference) (No. 1 of 2011)
Sentence;  definitive guidelines; sentences lower than the minimum recommended; R. v. Johnson and R. v. F.B.; youth defendant; weight to attach to guideline; R. v. B.; whether ranges rigid; Att.-Gen.’s Reference (No. 79 of 2010) (R. v. Sidaway); application to historic sexual offences; Att.-Gen.’s Reference (No. 78 of 2010)
Sentence; SOCPA 2005, s.73; discount; R. v. Ford
Sentence; suspended sentence; grounds for alteration; R. v. Cassidy; taking into account time spent on remand in custody; R. v. Mari and R. v. Hall
Sexual grooming; R. v. G.
Sexual offences prevention orders; scope; legality; R. v. Mortimer
Sexual offences prevention orders; appeals; R. v. Hoath; R. v. Standage
Special measures directions; removing case from the jury; R. v. Watts
Terrorism Act 2000, s.11; meaning of “membership”; R. v. Ahmed and Ahmed
Terrorism; images shown to jury; R. v. Iqbal (Abbas Niazi) and Iqbal (Ilyas Niazi)
Time limits; computation of time; R. (Zaporozhchenko) v. City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court; R. (Redya) v. Same 
Transcripts; retention by jury; R. v. Popescu

Archbold Print

Archbold Print and CD-ROM

Archbold on CD-ROM

Archbold on eBook

Archbold Print and eBook